Home > New TLDs > New TLDs – The New TLD Periodic Table

New TLDs – The New TLD Periodic Table

Although there had been previous attempts to classify and group elements it was Mendeleev who in 1869 created and published the familiar table we see today. The success of Mendeleev’s table came from two decisions he made: The first was to leave gaps in the table when it seemed that the corresponding element had not yet been discovered.  The second decision was to occasionally ignore the order suggested by the atomic weights and switch adjacent elements, such as cobalt and nickel, to better classify them into chemical families. With the development of theories of atomic structure, it became apparent that Mendeleev had inadvertently listed the elements in order of increasing atomic number.

In the years that followed after Mendeleev published his periodic table, the gaps he left were filled as chemists discovered more chemical elements.

I am no Mendeleev but here is a little ditty of an attempt  at a periodic table of new TLDs. The table is currently limited to five types of elements with a separate IDN category. The first is geographical TLDs, the second business TLDs, third are community based TLDs, then communication based TLDs and lastly we have brand TLDs. It is initially in the brand portion of TLD elements where I have left space (like Mendeleev) for any new brand TLDs. I envisage the whole list will grow considerably with the addition of sub categories but it is what I would call “good enough” right now and I hope you enjoy it. Within each element (TLD) I have also included the number of applicants currently known for that TLD.

Enjoy and let me know what you think.

Click to enlarge

  1. May 15, 2010 at 3:05 pm | #1

    Great stuff! I guess we’ll see if ICANN’s endless delay will show us ending up with a periodic table with as many elements as the “real” one, or if we’ll look like we’re stuck in the 30s.

  2. fred krueger
    May 15, 2010 at 10:56 pm | #2

    i’m curious — have you taken any chemistry? the columns are very important in the table of elements. Can you explain what .tree .health and .ngo have in common?

    and why 15 columns? look — its cute, but Mendeleev is rolling in his grave justa about now.

  3. May 17, 2010 at 5:08 am | #3

    I can easily answer this one :
    “.TREE concept (plant trees) should be a .NGO to keep its direct impact on .HEALTH” :-)

  4. jon
    May 17, 2010 at 9:20 pm | #4

    Not bad for a geographer!

  5. Rob
    May 17, 2010 at 10:38 pm | #5

    Jon – believe me I am trying really hard to use the Burgess Model in an upcoming post

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.